The strong showing at the Final Public Consultation was a fantastic start to the public rally against the Kettle Island bridge. But this will be a long fight, and the energy and enthusiasm displayed at that meeting will need to be sustained and amplified as we continue our campaign.
For now, your top priority should be to formally submit your comments to the consultants. Each and every one of your comments will become part of the public record for the project, and the more comments that are submitted, the more the consultants and the project sponsors will listen.
The submission deadline is October 10th.
An equally important action on your part is to send messages to your elected representatives and the decision makers for this project. Just copy your submission to the consultants and paste it into a message, or take a look at our Letter to Decision Makers for ideas on what to say. Click here for the contact list.
We’ve also had a request from CARAD (Community Action for Reasonable Analyses and Decisions), a coalition representing 15 impacted communities, to encourage you to send a copy of your feedback and comments to Jane Brammer, CARAD chair, at janebrammer@hotmail.com. CARAD will compile and present your feedback in a media event.
Please feel free to use any content from this website when writing your comments. Your comments don’t need to be long, but it is essential that your concerns are formally logged by the project. I also encourage you to publish your feedback on stopthebridge.org as a comment to this post. Others will benefit from seeing what you’ve written, and you’ll be published for the world to see.
A few highlights that you may want to cover include:
- This study puts trucks before people
- Community interests were not represented on the weightings committee
- The weightings exercise was not transparent
- Traffic and cost factors were weighted disproportionally high, while community and people factors were weighted disproportionally low
- The recommendation does not solve the problem of trucks on King Edward
- There are no factors that directly consider the negative impact of increased traffic on residential roads
- Health and safety issues associated with the transportation of hazardous goods and diesel fuel exhaust are not adequately addressed
Share on Facebook