| Subscribe via RSS

Phase 2B scope must be expanded to include other options

June 29th, 2010 | 1 Comment | Posted in Project Critique

The three alignments currently under consideration are inadequate to effectively solve the problems.

The Kettle Island corridor is a bad choice for all of the reasons detailed on this website; the Lower Duck Island corridor has severe limitations on the Gatineau side; and the Gatineau Airport corridor would have negative impacts on Convent Glen and could have detrimental environmental impacts.

Mauril Bélanger, MP Ottawa-Vanier, continues his arguments that the Canotek-Gatineau Airport corridor (Option 6A), a variation of Option 6 (Lower Duck Island) is the best option. It proposes using Maloney Blvd / Highway 148 on the Gatineau side as opposed to Lorrain Blvd. However, this has not been recognized by the NCC or the consultants as a viable option.

Consider these striking visuals.

Here’s a street-level view of Maloney Blvd, a four-lane commercial route, near Lorraine Blvd. The NCC and the consultants have deemed this to be INAPPROPRIATE as a commercial trucking route, and not worthy of further consideration. Within Option 6A, trucks would be directed along this route.


View Canotek – Gatineau Airport in a larger map

By contrast, here’s a street level view of Lorraine Blvd. The project team and the NCC believe that this IS A VIABLE OPTION option for a trucking route. This will be considered within the next phase of the project as part of the Lower Duck Island corridor (Option 6).


View Canotek – Gatineau Airport in a larger map

This simply makes no sense.

In addition, Sustainable Solutions continues to advocate for a downtown street bypass tunnel to be considered in the next phase of the study. This tunnel would run from the MacDonald Cartier bridge to south of Laurier on Nicholas, providing a non-stop route to the Queensway for bridge traffic – including trucks. Further analysis is required, but this may be a viable option to remove 100% of truck traffic from King Edward.

Limiting the solution options to the three corridors currently being considered is irresponsible. This approach will not solve the problems, and would have devastating impacts on the residents and communities within the selected corridor.

If the NCC is true to its mandate to do what’s best for the National Capital Region, the scope of Phase 2B must be expanded to included other options.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

NCC Board Meeting – June 29th

June 24th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in News and Commentary

The Phase 2A report will be presented at the upcoming NCC Board of Directors meeting:

June 29th
9:00 am – 5:20 pm
40 Elgin Street, Ottawa
Room 324

The public is invited to watch and listen, although there will be no opportunity for active public participation in the meeting.

The Interprovincial Crossings Phase 2A report is scheduled for 90 minutes, beginning at 2:15 pm. If you’d like to see first hand how the NCC reacts to the report, feel free to attend in person, or watch the meeting online on the NCC website.

Click here for the complete meeting agenda.

If you want to share your thoughts about the Interprovincial Crossing project with NCC Board of Directors, provide your feedback prior to the June 29th meeting.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

CBC Ottawa Morning – East end bridge debaters vs the NCC

June 16th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in News and Commentary, Video and Audio Clips

Members of Sustainable Solutions, a coalition of community associations in Ottawa concerned about the NCC’s plans for a new bridge across the Ottawa River, discussed the current status of the Interprovincial Crossing’s project on CBC’s Ottawa Morning show.

Click here to listen to the show via the CBC Ottawa Morning online archives.

Scroll to June 14: East end bridge debaters vs the NCC.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Online discussion forum: Interprovincial Crossings

June 9th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in News and Commentary, Your Participation

The Interprovincial Crossings debate is featured on an active online discussion forum: SkyscraperPage.com.

The global membership discusses development news and construction activity on projects from around the world, alongside discussions on urban design, architecture, transportation and many other topics.

Among other topics, members of the forum have recognized the potential of a downtown tunnel as a viable alternative to removing trucks from Ottawa’s downtown streets.

View and participate in the discussion at:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=144112&page=14

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Phase 2A report: Provide your feedback to the NCC

June 7th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in Your Participation

The Phase 2A report will be presented for approval at NCC Board of Directors meeting on June 29th.  Meeting details will be posted on the NCC website on June 22nd.

While the public is invited to attend, there will be no opportunity to speak.  So although the public can watch and listen, we will be unable to express any concerns or ask questions about the report at that meeting.

The next opportunity to publicly address the NCC Board of Directors will be in April 2011, by which time Phase 2B will be well underway.

To voice any concerns that you have about the Phase 2A report prior to the meeting, send an email to secretariat@ncc-ccn.ca, with a request to distribute your email to the Board.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Transportation Committee approves motions for further study and Ontario EA application

June 4th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in News and Commentary

The NCC presented their Phase 2A report on June 2nd to the City of Ottawa Transportation Committee.  The meeting also provided a forum for public presentations and questions.  Sustainable Solutions took this opportunity to present their case that the current study does not solve the fundamental problem of trucks on King Edward.  In addition, several community members presented their concerns about Ontario having opted out of the Environment Assessment process.

Based on the presentations and subsequent debate and discussion, the Committee passed three motions to be carried forward to City Council:

  1. A motion asking Ontario to apply Ontario EA law in the next phase such that residents of Ottawa will receive the benefits and protections that this affords.
  2. A motion asking that a scope of the NCC undertake a study to determine how any of the three corridors could solve the truck problem downtown, prior to selection of a recommended corridor.
  3. A motion asking that the interprovincial transit strategy be completed before a decision is made on a new bridge.

In response to these motions:

NCC representative Fred Gaspar told the committee that although officials haven’t had time to review in detail all of the committee’s recommendations,

“I don’t see any reason why they would present any sort of a problem and we certainly commit ourselves to working towards these objectives.”

Read more:
Jun. 3, Ottawa Citizen: City eyes diverting trucks from downtown

The formal motions are included in the minutes from the June 2nd Transportation Committee meeting.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

‘Sustainable Solutions – Solutions Durables’ formed to press for a real cure for the downtown truck problem

June 1st, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in News and Commentary, Project Critique

On June 2 at Ottawa Transportation Committee, the NCC’s consultant will table a report on the Phase 2A consultation process which is moving towards the selection of a location for an east end bridge.

12 Community Associations have come together under the name “Sustainable Solutions” to sign a joint statement and will attend the meeting to make presentations to the committee regarding the common position they have adopted in response to the current process.

Please see the attached media advisory and a copy of the joint statement. Members of Sustainable Solutions will have at the meeting the signed versions of the joint statement.

Sustainable Solutions will be calling on the NCC, the MTO, and the City of Ottawa to clarify how the proposed project will deliver a solution to the problem of inter-provincial heavy through trucks on the streets of Ottawa. Details can be found in the attached joint statement.

Sustainable Solutions – Solutions Durables is composed of the following associations:

Action Sandy Hill
Manor Park Community Association
Rockcliffe Park Residents Association
New Edinburgh Community Association
Rockcliffe Mews/Carson Grove Community Association
Beacon Hill Community Association
Common Sense Crossings (Convent Glen Community Association)
City Centre Coalition
The Friends of the Greenspace Alliance
The Greenbelt Coalition
Queenswood Heights Community Association
Blackburn Hamlet Community Association

—————————–
Media Advisory:  ‘Sustainable Solutions – Solutions Durables’ formed to press for a real cure for the downtown truck problem

OTTAWA, May 30, 2010 – Communities and organizations with an interest in the future of the National Capital Region have united to press the National Capital Commission (NCC), the Province of Ontario and the City of Ottawa to work with communities to find a solution to the ongoing problem of through-traffic of heavy trucks through Ottawa’s historic downtown area. This initiative is supported by prominent MPs, MPPs and City Councillors.

For decades, the heavy truck problem has plagued residents and businesses of the historic downtown. The problem is particularly acute along the King Edward-Rideau-Waller-Nicholas (KERWN) corridor. It has negatively impacted the livability and economic health of the district, and detracts seriously from the experience of visitors to the National Capital. Solving this problem should be a top priority of all levels of government.

The motivation for forming Sustainable Solutions – Solutions Durables has been the frustation felt by residents in having meaningful input into an NCC-led process focused on the narrow goal of constructing a new vehicular bridge across the Ottawa River. The NCC now proposes to study three potential bridge locations, ultimately selecting one that will be the subject of a federal environmental assessment.

One of the originally expressed goals of the NCC initiative was to substantially alleviate the downtown truck problem. However, the confusing information that has emanated from the process to date strongly suggests that a bridge would not solve the truck problem. Indeed, the figures presented indicate that the majority of trucks would continue to use the downtown corridor rather than a new bridge corridor. Information about the origins, destinations and purposes of the truck traffic across the Ottawa River is lacking, and the NCC has yet to initiate the commercial vehicle planning study that was requested by the NCC Board

The bridges under consideration would give rise to a host of very serious problems, such as urban sprawl; further community disruption on both sides of the river; loss of enjoyment of the NCC parkways and cycling paths in the east end; and serious impairment of ecologically significant areas (e.g. the NCC Greenbelt, Kettle Island, Greens Creek, McLaurin Bay). In spite of the virtually insurmountable problems associated with all three proposed bridge options, the NCC has shown little inclination to look seriously at options that would substantively address the pressing problem of heavy trucks in the downtown area.

On June 2, the consultants for the NCC will be presenting their Phase 2a study report to the City of Ottawa Transportation Committee. That report will outline their recommended study design and public consultation approach for Phase 2b, when the NCC proposes to select its preferred bridge option and conduct a federal environmental assessment of that option.

Members of Sustainable Solutions – Solutions Durables will be making representations to the Transportation Committee along with others affected by NCC proposals. Expect a lively and newsworthy discussion.

Contact:
Hugh Carter
Sustainable Solutions – Solutions Durables
Tel.: 613-830-3393
—————————–
Joint Statement (to be signed by all member Community Associations and presented to Transportation Committee)

The Interprovincial Crossings Study is led jointly by the National Capital Commission (NCC), the Ontario Ministry of Transportation and the Québec Ministry of Transportation, with technical support from the cities of Ottawa and Gatineau. The Study as currently envisaged is focused on selecting one out of three potential corridors for building a new bridge east of the Macdonald-Cartier Bridge.

One of the most critical issues facing the Region is the passage of about 2,500 heavy trucks per day between Highway 417 and the Macdonald – Cartier bridge, through residential streets in Ottawa’s downtown. The consequences in terms of health, safety and degradation of the surrounding areas are well-known and unacceptable. An environmentally sustainable solution must be found, one that does not simply spread the problem to even more neighbourhoods.

Phase 1 of the Study has recommended that heavy trucks be permitted on both the new corridor and the current approaches to the Macdonald – Cartier bridge, with the majority of the trucks remaining in the downtown core. The City of Ottawa Official Plan states that heavy trucks should be removed from the current King Edward, Rideau, Waller, Nicholas (KERWN) corridor once a new bridge is constructed. Meanwhile, the City of Gatineau has passed a motion that requests that heavy trucks remain on the King Edward corridor.

Significant uncertainty exists as to what will happen with heavy trucks if a new bridge is built. Will all heavy trucks be removed from Ottawa’s downtown? Will trucks be diffused between the new bridge and downtown? Will all heavy trucks be forced to use the new crossing? Who has the legal authority to ban heavy trucks on the KERWN corridor (since it serves as an interconnection between the Quebec and Ontario highway systems)? Would this decision be subject to legal appeal and potential negation?

Our organizations believe that these questions must be clearly answered in order to engage in meaningful public consultations in Phase 2B of the Study, and to enable a clear focus on the critical truck issue. We urge the Interprovincial Crossings Study Team to recognize the solidarity and determination of the public, as represented by our organizations, and to resolve this critical issue.

………………………………………………………..
Name and Position

………………………………………………………..
Organization
2nd June 2010
—————————–

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Phase 2A Final Report now available

June 1st, 2010 | No Comments | Posted in News and Commentary

AECOM Delcan has completed their final Phase 2A report, defining the process for making the final selection and the scope of Phase 2B, and summarizing the public feedback received to date.

Click here to access the report from the AECOM Delcan website.

The report will be presented at the following three events, which are open to the public:

  • June 2: City of Ottawa Transportation Committee;
  • June 8: Ville de Gatineau Comité plenier;
  • June 29: NCC Board of Directors Meeting.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

  • E-mail News Alerts

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

     

  • Polls

    I trust the NCC to do what's best for the National Capital Region

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Who we are.

    This blog was started by Ottawa residents concerned about the selection methodology for a new bridge and inter-provincial truck highway. Our research has led us to believe that Kettle Island is a bad choice for our region, yet we represent no particular group or neighbourhood. Anyone is invited and encouraged to participate in our blog.
     
    Our goal is to reach 100,000 unique visitors in 12 months. Let the politicians know that you care about this issue. Please add us to your social network, website or blog. Post your comments or subscribe to email alerts today!
?>