| Subscribe via RSS

Rabid squirrels in my living room

October 25th, 2008 | 1 Comment | Posted in Project Critique

A clever submission by Peter Wilson, a concerned citizen, to illustrate the absurd logic employed by the consultants to choose the Kettle Island corridor.

———
Kettle Island Proposal Will Remove One in Three Trucks From Downtown

As if I didn’t have enough to worry about with a proposal to put a four-lane interprovincial truck route through quiet east end neighbourhoods and past locally and nationally significant institutions, I returned from work yesterday afternoon to find three rabid squirrels trapped in my living room. They had soiled and chewed the furniture, were frantically climbing up the drapes trying to get out, and had broken two vases.

I moved my family out onto the front lawn and, using my cell phone, called the City of Ottawa for help. They sent two animal control experts over with computers. They didn’t speak to us as they entered our home, other than to tell us that they would summon us once they had a plan.

About half an hour later we were called inside for a meeting. We were pleased to see that one of the squirrels had been caught, although the other two were still destroying the living room.

“What’s the plan?” I asked.

“We’re going to release the one squirrel that we were able to catch into your kitchen,” one of the technocrats told me.

“That’s insane!” I said, “that will just make the problem worse!”

“Kitchens are the most attractive option for squirrels,” the other expert explained, “there’s food and water there; we hope the other two squirrels will eventually move there as well.”

This is a fictional story to illustrate the completely irrational approach used in selecting the Kettle Island Bridge option as the “preferred route” to get heavy trucks out of Ottawa. Option 7, a bridge between the Canotek Industrial Park and the Gatineau Airport solves, rather than spreads, the problem of trucks in Ottawa.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

A new twist – Algonquin land claim

October 23rd, 2008 | 1 Comment | Posted in News and Commentary

A front page news story in the Ottawa Citizen on Oct. 22 introduces a new twist to the forefront of the controversial Kettle Island recommendation.  An Algonquin claim to land along the Ottawa River and Kettle Island could have a significant impact on the project outcome.  Click here for the full article.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Tags:

New Video – The Battle of Kettle Island

October 9th, 2008 | 10 Comments | Posted in Video and Audio Clips

We urge you to check out the informative, high impact video put together by Peter Wilson, a concerned citizen. This is an amazing piece of work.


Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Your top priority: Submit your comments

The strong showing at the Final Public Consultation was a fantastic start to the public rally against the Kettle Island bridge. But this will be a long fight, and the energy and enthusiasm displayed at that meeting will need to be sustained and amplified as we continue our campaign.

For now, your top priority should be to formally submit your comments to the consultants. Each and every one of your comments will become part of the public record for the project, and the more comments that are submitted, the more the consultants and the project sponsors will listen.

The submission deadline is October 10th.

An equally important action on your part is to send messages to your elected representatives and the decision makers for this project. Just copy your submission to the consultants and paste it into a message, or take a look at our Letter to Decision Makers for ideas on what to say. Click here for the contact list.

We’ve also had a request from CARAD (Community Action for Reasonable Analyses and Decisions), a coalition representing 15 impacted communities, to encourage you to send a copy of your feedback and comments to Jane Brammer, CARAD chair, at janebrammer@hotmail.com. CARAD will compile and present your feedback in a media event.

Please feel free to use any content from this website when writing your comments. Your comments don’t need to be long, but it is essential that your concerns are formally logged by the project. I also encourage you to publish your feedback on stopthebridge.org as a comment to this post. Others will benefit from seeing what you’ve written, and you’ll be published for the world to see.

A few highlights that you may want to cover include:

  • This study puts trucks before people
  • Community interests were not represented on the weightings committee
  • The weightings exercise was not transparent
  • Traffic and cost factors were weighted disproportionally high, while community and people factors were weighted disproportionally low
  • The recommendation does not solve the problem of trucks on King Edward
  • There are no factors that directly consider the negative impact of increased traffic on residential roads
  • Health and safety issues associated with the transportation of hazardous goods and diesel fuel exhaust are not adequately addressed

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Another downtown bridge? You’ve got to be kidding

October 6th, 2008 | 2 Comments | Posted in Project Critique

See below for a well written commentary by a concerned citizen:

———

ANOTHER DOWNTOWN BRIDGE? YOU’VE GOT TO BE KIDDING

People First – Embracing Ottawa’s Vision for Growth
Population and employment in Ottawa are both expected to grow by 50 percent over the next two decades. Urban communities outside the Greenbelt are projected to accommodate 73 percent of new residents and 54 percent of new jobs (Master Transportation Plan, 2003, ii). New roads and bridges will be needed to foster and accommodate this growth, but not at the expense of human well being or environmental sustainability. Or so says Ottawa’s Official Plan, which envisions Ottawa in 2020 as a bigger and better green city where people come first.

Another Downtown Bridge Doesn’t Serve Ottawa
In light of these projections and commitments, another downtown bridge makes no sense. A bridge at Kettle Island might put smiles on the engineers’ faces, but it won’t meet Ottawa’s needs.

  • It won’t get trucks off King Edward Boulevard. 100% of heavy truck traffic will remain inside the city core. Rush hour will be a nightmare.
  • Technically viable and cheaper options exist that would ultimately link up with a planned ring road around the city, which will ease congestion and foster growth. Why were these options not recommended for further study?
  • Population and economic growth is occurring to the east, west and south of the Greenbelt and yet a bridge that only serves trucks and Quebec commuters has been proposed. So, after all that effort and money, Ottawa commuters will still not have the bridge we need.
  • The true cost of this new truck route through the city is incalculable. It imperils homes, a historic airport, a national heritage site, and a nature conservation area. It threatens a major hospital that the Province of Ontario has just spent millions of dollars to renovate. Is this development that puts people first? Does this make sense?

Take Back Control of Our City
The Ontario and Quebec Ministries of Transportation aren’t interested in people. Their “clients” are trucks. An environmentally sustainable, people-friendly capital city is not their aim. It should be the NCC’s goal, but still the President and Commissioner remain silent.

Kettle Island is the most expensive bridge option studied. Cheaper options exist. The Consultant Report ignores hidden costs totaling millions and millions of dollars. Who will pay? The NCC? The province? No. Home owners throughout the city will pay – with higher property taxes.

Take back control of our city. Hold the Ottawa city councilors who endorsed the Official Plan to account. Lobby the NCC. Say no to another downtown bridge. Say no to Kettle Island.
———

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Interview with Steve Taylor

October 4th, 2008 | 3 Comments | Posted in News and Commentary

In case you missed it, the Citizen (Oct. 3) published a one-on-one interview with Steve Taylor, project manager for the team of consultants that has recommended Kettle Island as the best technical alternative.

As Steve says,“Infrastructure is a big decision that’s going to last centuries. You want to put it in good locations where it’s going to survive changes of land use. It’s a huge amount of money. It’s being implemented to solve some major problems for the community and it will allow the community to grow and prosper. My job was actually just measure the differences and choose an impartial unbiased objective panel of people to actively compare them.”

An impartial, unbiased, and objective panel of people? I beg to differ. We know the organizations that were represented on that panel. And we know that they came to the table with their biases. We also know that there was no one at that table looking out for arguably the primary stakeholders in this project (and certainly the ones with the most to lose) – the residents and communities within corridor area.

For the complete Ottawa Citizen article, click here.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

Lansdowne Video is here!

October 3rd, 2008 | 6 Comments | Posted in Video and Audio Clips, Your Participation

If you witnessed the madness and mayhem at Lansdowne for the Final Public Consultation on Sept 24, we’re sure you’d agree that folks in Ottawa are ready for a fight. More than 1000 people showed up, and they were mad as hell.

If you missed it, here are some of the video highlights.

Share on Facebook Share on Facebook

  • E-mail News Alerts

    Enter your email address:

    Delivered by FeedBurner

     

  • Polls

    I trust the NCC to do what's best for the National Capital Region

    View Results

    Loading ... Loading ...
  • Who we are.

    This blog was started by Ottawa residents concerned about the selection methodology for a new bridge and inter-provincial truck highway. Our research has led us to believe that Kettle Island is a bad choice for our region, yet we represent no particular group or neighbourhood. Anyone is invited and encouraged to participate in our blog.
     
    Our goal is to reach 100,000 unique visitors in 12 months. Let the politicians know that you care about this issue. Please add us to your social network, website or blog. Post your comments or subscribe to email alerts today!
?>