<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: King Edward is the best option&#8230;not</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stopthebridge.org/2008/09/king-edward-is-the-best-optionnot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stopthebridge.org/2008/09/king-edward-is-the-best-optionnot/</link>
	<description>No to Kettle Island.  Yes to Healthy Communities.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2012 21:46:48 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rolf</title>
		<link>http://www.stopthebridge.org/2008/09/king-edward-is-the-best-optionnot/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Rolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 23:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stopthebridge.org/?p=263#comment-121</guid>
		<description>As I follow the debate and the commentaries, it becomes clear that the bridge is not only about the truck traffic downtown: the commuter traffic between Gatineau and east Ottawa on the (twice daily) clogged Rockcliffe Parkway has a lot to do with it; understandably so! 
No one has as yet said anything about why the Duck Island area was&#039;nt chosen.
On the Gatineau side of the Mac/Car Bridge two Autoroutes take up the traffic and disperse it. 
On the Ottawa side by all reasoning, King Edward should be a Decarie Type 6 lane Highway leading to the Queensway!
A Bridge in the east would still be required for those poor commuters of course (DUCK ISKAND!!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I follow the debate and the commentaries, it becomes clear that the bridge is not only about the truck traffic downtown: the commuter traffic between Gatineau and east Ottawa on the (twice daily) clogged Rockcliffe Parkway has a lot to do with it; understandably so!<br />
No one has as yet said anything about why the Duck Island area was&#8217;nt chosen.<br />
On the Gatineau side of the Mac/Car Bridge two Autoroutes take up the traffic and disperse it.<br />
On the Ottawa side by all reasoning, King Edward should be a Decarie Type 6 lane Highway leading to the Queensway!<br />
A Bridge in the east would still be required for those poor commuters of course (DUCK ISKAND!!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccredico</title>
		<link>http://www.stopthebridge.org/2008/09/king-edward-is-the-best-optionnot/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>ccredico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 21:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stopthebridge.org/?p=263#comment-113</guid>
		<description>Please see our sample letter to the decision makers posted here: http://www.stopthebridge.org/?page_id=274</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please see our sample letter to the decision makers posted here: <a href="http://www.stopthebridge.org/?page_id=274"  rel="nofollow">http://www.stopthebridge.org/?page_id=274</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccredico</title>
		<link>http://www.stopthebridge.org/2008/09/king-edward-is-the-best-optionnot/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>ccredico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stopthebridge.org/?p=263#comment-110</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your support.  I understand the difficulty in trying to make sense of this highly technical study.  The consultants are doing a good job of confusing the general public with lots of numbers.  

I&#039;ve tried to highlight some of the key points in an earlier posting:
* This study puts trucks before people
* Community interests were not represented on the weightings committee
* The weightings exercise was not transparent
* Traffic and cost factors were weighted disproportionally high, while community and people factors were weighted disproportionally low
* The recommendation does not solve the problem of trucks on King Edward
* There are no factors that directly consider the negative impact of increased traffic on residential roads
* Health and safety issues associated with the transportation of hazardous goods and diesel fuel exhaust are not adequately addressed

But I hear your concern that this is still just too technical and perhaps difficult to understand for those not intimately familiar with the study.  I&#039;ll work on creating a letter that can be used as a guideline for others to follow as they write their own letters.  Thanks for your feedback.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your support.  I understand the difficulty in trying to make sense of this highly technical study.  The consultants are doing a good job of confusing the general public with lots of numbers.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to highlight some of the key points in an earlier posting:<br />
* This study puts trucks before people<br />
* Community interests were not represented on the weightings committee<br />
* The weightings exercise was not transparent<br />
* Traffic and cost factors were weighted disproportionally high, while community and people factors were weighted disproportionally low<br />
* The recommendation does not solve the problem of trucks on King Edward<br />
* There are no factors that directly consider the negative impact of increased traffic on residential roads<br />
* Health and safety issues associated with the transportation of hazardous goods and diesel fuel exhaust are not adequately addressed</p>
<p>But I hear your concern that this is still just too technical and perhaps difficult to understand for those not intimately familiar with the study.  I&#8217;ll work on creating a letter that can be used as a guideline for others to follow as they write their own letters.  Thanks for your feedback.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Manor Park resident</title>
		<link>http://www.stopthebridge.org/2008/09/king-edward-is-the-best-optionnot/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Manor Park resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Sep 2008 15:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stopthebridge.org/?p=263#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Thanks so much for compiling all this information for us - you are doing a great service to your community. I&#039;d be only too happy to contact my elected representatives but lack in-depth knowledge on this issue and would not want to be immediately sorted into the &#039;NIMBY&#039; file. Is there any sample wording that you could provide for fellow community members to use in a letter/email campaign to our elected representatives?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks so much for compiling all this information for us &#8211; you are doing a great service to your community. I&#8217;d be only too happy to contact my elected representatives but lack in-depth knowledge on this issue and would not want to be immediately sorted into the &#8216;NIMBY&#8217; file. Is there any sample wording that you could provide for fellow community members to use in a letter/email campaign to our elected representatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

